Caredermis
SEPHORA Ombre à paupières délipsable Sir yes sir! n°275

SEPHORA · Makeup

Ombre à paupières délipsable Sir yes sir! n°275 — ingredient safety report

Every ingredient on the label, checked against published safety data. Profile tags on each card show who should take extra care. Label data from Open Beauty Facts, a community database — formulations change, so verify against your packaging.

55

Moderate concern

Contains ingredients worth knowing about. Review the flags below against your skin's needs.

Concern score 55/100 · 22 ingredients analyzed

Driven by TalcIARC Group 2A, EU CosIng Annex III (declarable / restricted)

Risk categories found

Cancer concern1 ingredient · max 5/10Irritation1 ingredient · max 2/10Environmental impact1 ingredient · max 2/10

Flagged ingredients (3)

Ingredients with a documented concern, from official datasets and our reviewed database.

Talc

absorbent · texturizer

Severity 5/10
Babies & kids: Best avoided
  • Cancer concern:IARC reclassified talc as probably carcinogenic (2A) in 2024; historic asbestos contamination drives concern.

A mineral powder at the center of major litigation and a 2024 IARC upgrade to 'probably carcinogenic'. Regulators specifically warn against powder use on babies (inhalation risk); cornstarch is the standard substitute.

Ethylhexylglycerin

preservative booster · skin conditioning

Severity 2/10
  • Irritation:Documented occasional contact allergy and eye irritation.

A preservative booster often paired with phenoxyethanol; low-risk overall with rare reports of contact allergy.

Mica

pigment · pearlescent

Severity 2/10Editorial
  • Environmental impact:Skin-safe; the ingredient's controversy is ethical (mining labor), not toxicological.

The shimmer mineral in highlighters and glowy creams; safe on skin, with sourcing ethics being its real controversy.

No concerns found (8)

Ingredients that are unflagged in our reviewed database, reviewed safe by the CIR panel, or on an EU permitted list.

Recognized ingredients (1)

Catalogued in official cosmetic-ingredient inventories (EU CosIng and others) with no safety flag on record. Being recognized isn't a safety guarantee — it means the ingredient is on record but no authority has published a concern.

  • Dipentaerythrityl Pentaisononanoate· skin conditioning, skin conditioning - e…

Not enough data (10)

Not found in any dataset we hold (often trade-name blends or very niche ingredients), so we can't assess them — this is not a safety judgment either way.

  • Cl 77891 (Titanium Dioxide)
  • lsostearyl Neopentanoate
  • Cl 77499 (Iron Oxides)
  • Cl 77491 (Iron Oxides)
  • Cl 77492 (Iron Oxides)
  • Cl 77510 (Ferric Ferrocyanide)
  • Cl 77742 (Manganese Violet)
  • Cl 19140 (Yellow 5)
  • 01 77007 (Ultramarines)
  • Cl L42090 (Blue 1 Lake)

This report is informational, not medical advice. Assessments summarize published findings (EU CosIng, IARC, ECHA, CIR, SCCS and others) about ingredients — not clinical testing of this specific product. Exposure, concentration and individual sensitivity all matter. Consult a dermatologist for medical concerns.

Lower-concern makeup

Same category, better ingredient safety score than this product — somewhere to look next if this one raised concerns.

Full ingredient list (as analyzed)

Cl 77891 (Titanium Dioxide), Mica, Magnesium Myristate, Talc, lsostearyl Neopentanoate, Lauroyl Lysine, Dipentaerythrityl Pentaisononanoate, Phenyl Trimethicone, Cl 77499 (Iron Oxides), Cl 77491 (Iron Oxides), Cl 77492 (Iron Oxides), Cl 77510 (Ferric Ferrocyanide), Ethylhexylglycerin, Maltodextrin, Sorbic Acid, BHT, Tin Oxide, Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract, Cl 77742 (Manganese Violet), Cl 19140 (Yellow 5), 01 77007 (Ultramarines), Cl L42090 (Blue 1 Lake)

More makeup reports